Therapist dating clients

It makes sense that you might want to normalize the relationship by asking to go for a coffee or have lunch; to invite her to a family wedding or at least to, please, share more information about her life with you. The therapeutic relationship is different by design. A boundary in counseling is much like a boundary on a piece of land. It sets the therapist apart from other people in your life. There is no set standard for the particulars of boundaries. Different models for therapy and different disciplines have different ideas about what the boundary closes in and closes out.

Romantic/sexual relationships

Sex between therapists and clients has emerged as a significant phenomenon, one that the profession has not adequately acknowledged or addressed. Extensive research has led to recognition of the extensive harm that therapist-client sex can produce. Nevertheless, research suggests that perpetrators account for about 4. This chapter looks at the history of this problem, the harm it can cause, gender patterns, the possibility that the rate of therapists sexually abusing their clients is declining, and the mental health professions' urgent, unfinished business in this area.

When people are hurting, unhappy, frightened, or confused, they may seek help from a therapist. They may be depressed, perhaps thinking of killing themselves. They may be unhappy in their work or relationships, and not know how to bring about change. They may be suffering trauma from rape, incest, or domestic violence. They may be bingeing and purging, abusing drugs and alcohol, or engaging in other behaviors that can destroy health and sometimes be fatal.

The therapeutic relationship is a special one, characterized by exceptional vulnerability and trust. People may talk to their therapists about thoughts, feelings, events, and behaviors that they would never disclose to anyone else. Every state in the United States has recognized the special nature of the therapeutic relationship and the special responsibilities that therapists have in relation to their clients by requiring special training and licensure for therapists, and by recognizing a therapist-patient privilege which safeguards the privacy of what patients talk about to their therapist.

A relatively small minority of therapists take advantage of the client's trust and vulnerability and of the power inherent in the therapist's role by sexually exploiting the client. Each state has prohibited this abuse of trust, vulnerability, and power through licensing regulations. Therapist-patient sex is also subject to civil law as a tort i.

The ethics codes of all major mental health professionals prohibit the offense. The health care professions at their earliest beginnings recognized the harm that could result from sexual involvement with patients. The Hippocratic Oath, named after the physician who practiced around the fifth century B. Freud, a pioneer of the "talking cure," emphasized the prohibition in his writings.

The historical consensus among health care professionals that sex with patients is prohibited as destructive continued into the modern age. In the landmark i. Hartogs , the court held: What are the "harmful effects" the court referred to? While the scientific and professional literature had contained carefully documented individual case studies and theoretical papers describing the harm that therapist-patient sex could cause, larger scale studies began to emerge in the s and 70s. William Masters and Virginia Johnson, for example, gathered data from many research participants for their report Human Sexual Response and the report Human Sexual Inadequacy.

They were surprised at the number of participants in their samples who had engaged in sex with therapists. The extensive data that Masters and Johnson collected on each participant allowed them to compare the consequences of sex with a therapist to the consequences of other events such as consensual sexual relationships with a spouse or life-partner, consensual sex occurring outside long-term relationships, and various forms of rape, incest, and abuse.

So striking were the harmful consequences associated with therapist-patient sex that Masters and Johnson wrote: Psychologist Phyllis Chesler, in her landmark study Women and Madness , included a section on therapist-patient sex. She reported consequences among the sample of women whom she studied including severe depression and suicide. Pope and Vetter published a national study of patients who had been sexually involved with a therapist. The three studies mentioned above represent only a few of the diverse sampling procedures used to study the harm that can result from therapist-patient sex.

Diverse studies have gathered samples of patients who never again sought mental health services as well as those who later entered into therapy again with a new therapist. Patients who have experienced therapist-patient sex have been compared to carefully matched control groups of patients who have experienced sex with their treating physicians who were not therapists and of patients who have been in psychotherapy but not experienced therapist-patient sex. The effects of therapist-patient sex have been assessed by independent clinicians, by subsequent therapists of the patients, and by the patients themselves.

Data have been collected using structured behavioral observation, standardized tests and other psychometric instruments, clinical interview, and other methods. What follows is a brief description of 10 of the most common reactions that are frequently associated with therapist-patient sex. These reactions are: While common, these reactions do not characterize all patients who have been sexually involved with a therapist.

Extreme ambivalence can be one of the most debilitating consequences of sexual involvement with a therapist. Caught between two sets of conflicting impulses, those suffering this consequence may find themselves psychologically paralyzed, unable to make much progress in either direction. On one hand, they may want to escape from the abusive therapist, from the destructive relationship, and from the continuing effects of the abuse. They may wish to break the taboo of silence that the therapist has imposed, to speak out truthfully about what has happened to them.

They may seek justice and restitution in the courts. They may try to prevent the therapist from abusing other patients by filing formal complaints with professional ethics committees, the hospital or clinic if any employing the therapist, and licensing agencies, in part to see if to what degree these organizations are serious about protecting patients from abuse. They may try to make sense of and work through their experience of abuse so that they can move on with their lives.

But on the other hand, they may believe that they need to protect the abusive therapist at all costs. Abusive therapists are often exceptionally adept at creating and nurturing these dynamics. Exploited patients may learn from the therapist that the most important thing is to keep the sexual relationship secret so as not to harm the therapist's career. They may have been led to believe that the sexual relationship was an act of great self-sacrifice on the part of the therapist, a moral and ethical act that was the only way that the therapist could "cure" whatever was wrong with the patient.

Ambivalence of this kind is often found among those who have experienced other forms of abuse. Incest survivors, for example, may experience contradictory impulses to flee the abusive parent, and yet also to cling to and protect that same parent. Similarly, some battered women will desperately want to escape to safety but also feel an overwhelming impulse to submit to the batterer, to take all blame upon themselves, and to keep the battering secret from all others.

Many people who have been sexually involved with a therapist, whether the sex started before or after termination, will experience intense forms of cognitive dysfunction. There may be interference with attention, memory, and concentration. The flow of experience will often been interrupted by unbidden thoughts, intrusive images, flashbacks, memory fragments, or nightmares. These cognitive impairments may interfere significantly with the person's ability to work, to participate in social activities, and sometimes even to carry out the most routine aspects of self-care.

Sometimes the pattern of consequences may fit the model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Emotional lability reflects the severe disruption of the person's characteristic ways of feeling in a way that is similar to cognitive dysfunction reflecting the severe disruption of the person's characteristic ways of thinking. Intense emotions may erupt suddenly and without seeming cause, as if they were completely unrelated to the current situation.

The emotional disconnect can be profound: Emotions begin to feel alien and threatening, as if they were unwanted intruders into the inner life. Cognitive dysfunction can involve interrupting the flow of experience with unbidden thoughts, intrusive images, etc. The person begins to feel helpless, as if the emotions were completely out of control, as if he or she were at the mercy of a powerful, intrusive enemy, an occupying force. People who have been sexually involved with a therapist may experience a subsequent sense of emptiness, as if their sense of self had been hollowed out, permanently taken away from them.

The sense of emptiness is often accompanied by a sense of isolation, as if they were no longer members of society, cut off forever from feeling a social bond with other people. She wrote in If I am alone, I will cease to exist. People who become sexually involved with a therapist may become flooded with persistent, irrational guilt.

The guilt is irrational because it is in all instances the therapist's responsibility to avoid sexually abusing a patient. It is the therapist who has been taught, from the earliest days of training, that engaging in sex with patients is prohibited, no matter what the rationale. It is the therapist whose ethics code clearly classifies sexual involvement with patients as a violation of ethical behavior. It is the therapist who is licensed by the state in recognition of the need to protect patients from unethical, unscrupulous, and harmful practices, and it is the licensing boards and regulations that clearly charge therapists with refraining from this form of behavior that can place patients at risk for pervasive harm.

As the research summarized in subsequent sections will show, gender effects in this area are significant. It is possible that gender may be associated with the ways in which this irrational guilt develops and is sustained. Psychiatrists Melanie Carr and Gail Robinson wrote: The almost universal expression of guilt and shame expressed by women who have been sexually involved with their therapists is a testament to the power of this conditioning" p. Psychiatrist Virginia Davidson, analyzing the similarities between therapist-patient sex and rape, wrote:.

When therapists intentionally and knowingly violate their patients' trust, as they do when they decide to become sexually involved with them, the effects on the patients' ability to trust can be profound and lasting. Therapy may rest on a foundation of exceptional trust. People may walk into the offices of complete strangers and, if the stranger is a therapist, begin talking about thoughts, feelings, and impulses that they would reveal literally to no one else.

Every state, appreciating the exceptionally sensitive nature of the "secrets" that patients may entrust to their therapists, have established in their laws a formal therapist-patient privilege. The ethics codes of all major mental health professions recognize the therapist's responsibility to maintain confidentiality when patients trust the therapist to the extent that they disclose personal information in therapy. Beyond investing therapists with trust regarding their own privacy, confidentiality, and "secrets," patients trust therapists to act in a way consistent with patient well-fare and to avoid intentionally engaging in any behavior that not only is unethical and prohibited by law but also places the patient at so needless a risk for harm.

In some ways, therapy is similar to surgery. Patients agreeing to surgery allow themselves to be opened up physically because they have been led to believe that the process has some reasonable prospects of leading to improvement. They allow a professional to do to them--i. They trust that the professional will not take advantage of them or abuse them, sexually or otherwise, during this process. Therapy patients submit themselves to a process in which they open up psychologically because they also have been led to believe that this process is likely to yield improvement.

They trust therapists to avoid any exploitation or abuse during the process. It was Freud who first noted this similarity. He wrote that "talking therapy" was "comparable to a surgical operation. As a group, patients who have been sexually involved with a therapist have significantly increased risk of both suicide attempts and completed suicides when compared with the general population and other groups of patients.

Therapists who sexually exploit their patients tend to violate both roles and boundaries in therapy. The focus of sessions shifts from the clinical needs of the patient to the personal desires of the therapist. The therapist brings about a reversal of roles: The fundamental clinical, ethical, and legal boundary that would prevent a therapist from turning patients into sources for the therapist of sexual pleasure, experimentation, relief, variety, or control is violated.

In a legitimate therapy, the therapeutic process, effectiveness, and improvements that therapist and patient work on during each sessions is expected to continue between sessions and, ultimately, after termination. Entering psychotherapy to become less depressed, to overcome stage fright, or to resolve conflicts with a partner would make little long-term sense if the depression stage fright, and conflict resumed immediately after termination.

In all states, psychologists (at least) have an ethical responsibility to avoid “dual” relationships; that is, having a client-therapist relationship and. of her choices in men, and began making better decisions in her dating life. I was your therapist and because of that, I can't have a social It can be tempting to engage in a relationship with a former patient or client.

The first time my shrink kissed me was in his office. I was 24 and had been his client for six months. When I started therapy with him I was living in Denver, collecting unemployment and feeling lost. My father had just died unexpectedly of a burst aorta back East while I was on a backpacking trip.

Clients go to psychotherapy seeking a mind massage, but all too often things turn physical.

The idea that therapists might play Cupid with patients tantalizes patients and therapists. An anecdotal survey of my psychiatrist colleagues suggests that the matchmaking impulse is very common. A senior colleague, for example, tells me he was treating a young man who was struggling to find a partner.

Can Psychologists Date Patients or Former Patients?

Love and relationships often form the main issues that patients take to their psychologists. Often in helping their patients, psychologists stand in danger of a developing a personal bond too since in human relationships, the impulses of love and support are closely related and often expressed in the same manner. But how ethical, legal or even practical it is for psychologists to date patients or even former patients for that matter? Psychologists and current clients Almost all developed societies prohibit any romantic or sexual relationship between a psychologist and a current patient. The American Association of Psychology is unequivocal about the issue and rule

Why Your Therapist Can’t Be Your Friend

Dear Dr. Rob, I know you said that dual relationships with your shrink are inappropriate, but what about after therapy is over? I email and sometimes have lunch with my former therapist and we consider ourselves good friends at this point. Have you ever done this with any of your clients? For Psychologists in the United States, personal relationships whether they be sexual or platonic after professional ones are frowned upon. The reason for this and all ethical codes is client protection. There is an inherent power differential between therapist and client. The thinking is that no matter how much your erstwhile therapist discloses to you as friends, he or she will always have that knowledge, that information that you might not have shared had you two not had a therapeutic relationship. Technically, personal relationships can develop two years following the termination of the professional work together.

Your Name required.

Sex between therapists and clients has emerged as a significant phenomenon, one that the profession has not adequately acknowledged or addressed. Extensive research has led to recognition of the extensive harm that therapist-client sex can produce. Nevertheless, research suggests that perpetrators account for about 4. This chapter looks at the history of this problem, the harm it can cause, gender patterns, the possibility that the rate of therapists sexually abusing their clients is declining, and the mental health professions' urgent, unfinished business in this area.

Frequently Asked Questions

Completed over a three-year period, this revision of the ethical code is the first in a decade and includes major updates in areas such as confidentiality, dual relationships, the use of technology in counseling, selecting interventions, record keeping, end-of-life issues and cultural sensitivity. All ACA members are required to abide by the ACA Code of Ethics, and 22 state licensing boards use it as the basis for adjudicating complaints of ethical violations. As a service to members, Counseling Today is publishing a monthly column focused on new or updated aspects of the ACA Code of Ethics the ethics code is also available online at www. David Kaplan: Today we are going to be talking about changes around sexual or romantic relationships specifically as they relate to Standard A. To start off, my understanding from the new code is that sexual or romantic interactions between a counselor and a current client continue to be prohibited. Sexual or romantic interactions with clients continue to be prohibited? The ACA Code of Ethics continues to recognize the harm that can be impacted upon clients when they are sexually intimate with their counselor. Engaging in any type of sexual or intimate relationship with a current client is abuse of power. Clients come into counseling emotionally and psychologically vulnerable and in need of assistance, so a counselor trying to engage in such relationships would be trying to take advantage of that client and their vulnerabilities to meet their own needs. So the reason that the ACA Code of Ethics continues to give no leeway and to ban all sexual or romantic interactions with clients is because we know that harm always occurs when that happens? That relates to malpractice suits and the one exception that liability companies such as the ACA Insurance Trust make about sexual contact with a client.

Dating my therapist

.

Sexual Issues

.

.

.

.

Can a Patient and a Therapist Ever Have a Romantic Relationship?
Related publications